A new behavior GenAI is bringing. We have cycles: Generation and Review. We can learn in both.
Most people go for Generating with AI and Reviewing by a person. It’s about critical thinking, not about speed. As I said — a lot — in the past about no-code. It’s not about speed, it’s about bringing more people into the world of “building product”.
I’ll use myself as an example. I’m not a good developer. Today I understand MUCH more about some frameworks and coding tools because of REVIEW, not generation. Most likely, if I had to generate it myself, I’d give up and go back to no-code.
Why am I bringing this up here? So that we don’t use GenAI in a DUMB way. Doing ctrl c + ctrl v is the dumb way. Critical thinking and dealing with complex problems so you know how to ask, plus the review cycle, are HUGELY important.
Please don’t be a proxy from one AI to another AI, but someone who adds to the process. :)
The original post includes an image.
Originally written in Portuguese and published on LinkedIn on June 20, 2025. I translated it into English with the help of AI (Claude): it let me bring my LinkedIn posts to people who don’t read Portuguese without rewriting each one from scratch. I reviewed the translation to keep my original meaning and tone.